Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circulation ; 137(4): 354-363, 2018 01 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29138293

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Efforts to safely reduce length of stay for emergency department patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have had mixed success. Few system-wide efforts affecting multiple hospital emergency departments have ever been evaluated. We evaluated the effectiveness of a nationwide implementation of clinical pathways for potential ACS in disparate hospitals. METHODS: This was a multicenter pragmatic stepped-wedge before-and-after trial in 7 New Zealand acute care hospitals with 31 332 patients investigated for suspected ACS with serial troponin measurements. The implementation was a clinical pathway for the assessment of patients with suspected ACS that included a clinical pathway document in paper or electronic format, structured risk stratification, specified time points for electrocardiographic and serial troponin testing within 3 hours of arrival, and directions for combining risk stratification and electrocardiographic and troponin testing in an accelerated diagnostic protocol. Implementation was monitored for >4 months and compared with usual care over the preceding 6 months. The main outcome measure was the odds of discharge within 6 hours of presentation RESULTS: There were 11 529 participants in the preimplementation phase (range, 284-3465) and 19 803 in the postimplementation phase (range, 395-5039). Overall, the mean 6-hour discharge rate increased from 8.3% (range, 2.7%-37.7%) to 18.4% (6.8%-43.8%). The odds of being discharged within 6 hours increased after clinical pathway implementation. The odds ratio was 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 2.3-2.6). In patients without ACS, the median length of hospital stays decreased by 2.9 hours (95% confidence interval, 2.4-3.4). For patients discharged within 6 hours, there was no change in 30-day major adverse cardiac event rates (0.52% versus 0.44%; P=0.96). In these patients, no adverse event occurred when clinical pathways were correctly followed. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of clinical pathways for suspected ACS reduced the length of stay and increased the proportions of patients safely discharged within 6 hours. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry). Unique identifier: ACTRN12617000381381.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/normas , Procedimentos Clínicos/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Hospitalização , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/sangue , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Troponina/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...